Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, largely executable overview: concrete install/verify commands, hardware-based model selection, an error-handling table, and clearly signaled reference files. Its main weaknesses are the vague second half of the workflow (steps 7-10 name outcomes without commands), an orphaned examples.md reference file, and content duplicated between the body and skill-workflow.md.
Suggestions
Add concrete commands for the underspecified steps: e.g., environment variables for GPU/driver setup (OLLAMA_GPU_LAYER_SIZE or CUDA install steps), ollama cp / OLLAMA_MODELS for persistence (step 9), and a curl --timing or ollama run --verbose command for the step 10 performance baseline.
Link references/examples.md from the Examples section so the 523-line expanded example file is discoverable, and de-duplicate the model table and install commands between SKILL.md and references/skill-workflow.md.
Fix the dangling Resources entry ("Hardware sizing guide: RAM requirements...") by either linking a real file or folding it into the Prerequisites section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and dense: concrete commands, RAM-to-model tables, and an error table with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable items remain — the dangling unlinked "Hardware sizing guide: RAM requirements by model parameter count and quantization level" line and duplication of the model table and install commands between the body and skill-workflow.md. Not 3 because there is no unnecessary explanation, and not 5 because of that duplication and the loose Resources line. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: "brew install ollama && brew services start ollama", "curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh", a complete docker run command, "ollama pull llama3.2", and verification via "curl http://localhost:11434/api/tags". Not 5 because steps 7-10 lack specifics ("Set up GPU acceleration if NVIDIA or Apple Silicon hardware is detected" and "Validate end-to-end inference latency and throughput" name no commands), and integration code lives only in the referenced file; not 3 because the core workflow is copy-paste executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 10-step ordered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (step 5 test prompt "ollama run llama3.2 'Say hello'", step 6 REST API curl check, step 10 performance validation) plus an error-handling table for recovery. Not 5 because steps 7-10 (integration, GPU setup, persistence, performance validation) lack checkpoints and verification commands, leaving minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with clearly signaled one-level-deep references ([references/skill-workflow.md](references/skill-workflow.md) and [references/errors.md](references/errors.md), both real files) and appropriately concise inline content. Not 5 because references/examples.md (523 lines of expanded examples) is never linked from the body, and skill-workflow.md largely duplicates the body's model and installation content rather than adding a distinct layer. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |