Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with concrete templates, commands, and code, and uses progressive disclosure cleanly. Workflow clarity is the main gap: inter-stage validation is delegated to the end rather than checkpointed between stages.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after each stage (e.g. 'Before advancing, confirm the expected report file exists and is non-empty') instead of deferring all validation to 6verity.
De-duplicate the stage list — keep the authoritative table and trim the repeated prose enumeration to reduce token cost.
Note that ../_references/math_modeling_norms.md is an external reference outside the bundle; confirm the path resolves or move it under references/.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes competence, but the stage list is restated across prose, a workflow code block, a table, and the todo template, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready plan.md/todo.md templates, a concrete directory skeleton, engine commands (typst/xelatex), and exact figure-insertion code for both Typst and LaTeX. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Stages are clearly sequenced with stage-boundary rules and a per-stage todo update, but there is no explicit inter-stage validation checkpoint before the final 6verity stage — only an implicit handoff. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single one-level-deep reference (../_references/math_modeling_norms.md) is clearly signaled and scoped, and the body is organized into well-delineated sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |