Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete templates and a clear directory structure, but as a batch orchestrator it lacks validation checkpoints between stages, and its sole external reference points to a missing file.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/gate checkpoints between stages (e.g. verify each stage's report exists and is non-empty before advancing, and re-run 6verity on failure) to lift workflow clarity above the batch-operation cap.
Fix or remove the dangling reference to '../_references/math_modeling_norms.md' — create the file or drop the pointer so navigation is not broken.
Consider splitting the large plan.md/directory templates into a referenced reference file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic modeling concepts; minor redundancy between the plan.md template and the stage table keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready artifacts: exact plan.md/todo.md templates, a full directory skeleton, per-engine figure code snippets, and a stage-by-stage table — fully actionable for an instruction skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (ask prefs → plan → todo → execute), but this batch multi-skill orchestration has no inter-stage validation checkpoints beyond updating todo.md; per the feedback-loop guideline for batch operations, missing validation caps the score at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Has organized sections and one signaled one-level reference, but the referenced file '../_references/math_modeling_norms.md' does not exist, and most detail is inlined rather than appropriately split into separate files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |