Analyzes article structure, identifies positions requiring visual aids, generates illustrations with Type × Style two-dimension approach. Use when user asks to "illustrate article", "add images", "generate images for article", or "为文章配图".
97
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates what the skill does (analyze articles and generate contextual illustrations using a specific methodology) and when to use it (with explicit trigger phrases in both English and Chinese). The description is concise, uses third person voice, and provides enough specificity to distinguish it from generic image generation skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'analyzes article structure', 'identifies positions requiring visual aids', 'generates illustrations with Type × Style two-dimension approach'. The mention of the two-dimension approach adds technical specificity. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (analyzes structure, identifies positions, generates illustrations with a specific approach) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural trigger terms users would say: 'illustrate article', 'add images', 'generate images for article', and even a Chinese equivalent '为文章配图'. Good coverage of common phrasings. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of article analysis, position identification, and the specific 'Type × Style two-dimension approach' creates a clear niche. The triggers are specific to article illustration rather than generic image generation, reducing conflict risk. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
N/AReviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Something went wrong
Validation
72%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 8 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 8 / 11 Passed | |
9eb032a
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.