Analyzes article structure, identifies positions requiring visual aids, generates illustrations with Type × Style × Palette three-dimension approach. Use when user asks to "illustrate article", "add images", "generate images for article", or "为文章配图".
72
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates what the skill does (analyze articles and generate contextual illustrations using a specific methodology) and when to use it (with explicit trigger phrases in both English and Chinese). The description is concise, uses third-person voice, and provides enough specificity to distinguish it from general image generation skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'analyzes article structure', 'identifies positions requiring visual aids', 'generates illustrations with Type × Style × Palette three-dimension approach'. These are detailed and concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (analyzes structure, identifies positions, generates illustrations with a specific methodology) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural trigger terms users would say: 'illustrate article', 'add images', 'generate images for article', and even a Chinese equivalent '为文章配图'. Good coverage of natural language variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche: article-specific illustration generation with a specific three-dimension approach (Type × Style × Palette). Unlikely to conflict with generic image generation skills due to the article-context focus and methodology specificity. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill with excellent workflow clarity and progressive disclosure. The 6-step workflow with explicit blocking gates and confirmation policies provides strong guardrails. The main weakness is moderate verbosity in the Image Generation Tools and User Input Tools sections, which contain detailed resolution logic that could be more concise, though the complexity may be justified by the number of runtime environments supported.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly long (~250 lines) with some sections that could be tightened—e.g., the Image Generation Tools resolution logic is verbose with multiple nested conditions, and the User Input Tools section explains fallback behavior Claude could infer. However, most content is genuinely instructive and not redundant, so it's not egregiously padded. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete guidance: specific file naming conventions (NN-{type}-{slug}.md), exact directory structures, YAML frontmatter fields, specific command flags (--type, --style, --palette), confirmation question templates, and clear output format. The workflow steps are executable with specific artifacts to produce at each stage. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit blocking gates (Steps 1.5 and 5 marked ⛔ BLOCKING, Step 3 marked as hard gate). Validation checkpoints are present: confirmation before generation, prompt files must exist before backend invocation, retry-once-on-failure. The confirmation policy section adds a clear feedback loop for user approval. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md serves as a well-structured overview with clear one-level-deep references to 6+ supporting files (workflow.md, styles.md, prompt-construction.md, etc.). Each reference is contextually placed at the relevant workflow step with markdown links. The main file contains enough to understand the full process while deferring detailed procedures appropriately. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
72%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 8 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 8 / 11 Passed | |
bd5745f
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.