Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally actionable and concise with a well-sequenced, validated workflow backed by red-lines and common-mistake sections — strong on execution. Its only gap is that all content lives inline in one file with no bundle references, leaving progressive disclosure flat.
Suggestions
Consider extracting the '常见错误' and '红线' checklists into a reference file (e.g. CHECKLISTS.md) and pointing to it one level deep, which would raise progressive_disclosure without losing the lean overview.
No change needed to conciseness, actionability, or workflow_clarity — these are already at the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: assumes git/worktree competence, uses tight bash blocks and tables, and avoids explaining what a branch, worktree, or PR is — every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable bash commands throughout (worktree detection, merge, push, gh pr create, cleanup), with exact confirmation prompts and concrete menu text to display verbatim — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (test-before-options, verify-after-merge) and feedback loops (test fails → stop; discard requires 'discard' confirmation), capped by red-line and common-mistake checklists. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections but it is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no external reference files; the depth is appropriate yet progressive disclosure is one-level-flat with nothing to split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |