Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, well-structured operational skill with strong workflow clarity, explicit validation/feedback loops, and mostly executable guidance. Its only soft spots are placeholder-laden commands and a verbose rationalizations table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and task-oriented with code blocks and tables, assuming Claude's competence; the main over-explanation is the 10-row '常见的合理化借口' coaching table and some warning prose that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, mostly executable bash commands (git checkout/merge/branch/worktree), but relies on placeholders like <base-branch>, <feature-branch>, and <测试命令>, and the PR-creation step is described abstractly ('用代码托管平台的工具'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (test gate, re-test on merge result), feedback loops for error recovery (merge failure → stop, cleanup refusal → 3-option menu), and confirmation checklists (the 'discard' word gate) — exemplary for destructive operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files and is organized into clear sections (步骤 1–6, 快速参考, 常见的合理化借口); at ~200 lines nothing clearly demands splitting into a reference, though a couple of tables could optionally be externalized. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |