Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally well-sequenced orchestration process with concrete commands, explicit validation/fuse logic, and real offloaded scripts — its workflow clarity is a strength. Its weaknesses are verbosity (redundant rationalizations table) and broken progressive disclosure: three referenced prompt-template files are missing from the bundle, leaving navigation dead-ends.
Suggestions
Add the missing bundle files implementer-prompt.md, task-reviewer-prompt.md, and re-review-prompt.md so the '模板：[...]' references resolve — or remove the references and inline only what is needed.
Tighten the '常见的合理化借口' table or fold it into the relevant sections; several rows restate rules already stated verbatim above, which is pure token cost.
Consider moving '模型选择' detail into a reference file and keeping only the selection table in SKILL.md to reduce the monolith's inline weight.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and largely earns its tokens with specific operational rules rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it is noticeably verbose — the '常见的合理化借口' table restates rules already in the body and the repeated '绝不' injunctions re-emphasize the same points — matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the leaner anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance: exact script invocations (scripts/task-brief PLAN_FILE N, scripts/review-package PLAN_FILE BASE HEAD), exact ledger line formats, a four-status report taxonomy, and round-escalation rules — but the three referenced template files (implementer-prompt.md, task-reviewer-prompt.md, re-review-prompt.md) are absent from the bundle, a minor gap that keeps it at 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps' rather than fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two dot flowcharts plus numbered phases (dispatch → handle report → review → fix loop → complete) give a clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (per-task review, directed re-review each round, final branch review), feedback loops (fix rounds with a 5-round fuse/circuit-breaker), and checklists (conflict-scan table, rationalizations) — a clean match to 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists for complex processes'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is clear and executable detail is genuinely offloaded to real scripts (review-package, sdd-workspace, task-brief), but the three template .md files referenced by '模板：[...]' do not exist in the bundle — dead-end references — and the body remains a long monolith with inline content (model selection, rationalizations) that could be split, matching 'some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled / content that should be separate is inline' rather than the well-placed anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |