Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated multi-step workflow and good error handling. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy in the HARD-GATE section and a monolithic single-file structure with no progressive disclosure to reference materials.
Suggestions
Remove the HARD-GATE block or collapse it into a short checklist, since each rule is already enforced in the corresponding step.
Move the YAML field schema and metadata.json format into a references/ file (e.g. WORKFLOW-SCHEMA.md) and link to it from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient operational prose, but the HARD-GATE block restates rules already embedded in the steps and a few imperative reminders ('不要跳步') are redundant, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact Read/Bash/Write/Agent tool usage, an ordered directory-check sequence, copy-paste install commands, and exact output file/JSON structures. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step process with explicit validation checkpoints (test -d directory checks, required-input prompting, stop-if-not-found) and an error-recovery section that skips downstream dependents on failure. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well organized into labeled sections with no nested references, but it is a single long file with inline YAML schema and metadata.json examples that could be split into a reference file for cleaner overview navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |