Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, highly actionable planning skill: concrete templates, a clear end-to-end workflow, and explicit validation/feedback loops. Its only weakness is mild verbosity in a few philosophical passages that explain concepts Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete templates and terse principle reminders, but contains minor over-explanation of concepts Claude knows (e.g. "你对能一次放入上下文的代码推理得最好，文件越专注你的编辑越可靠" justifies why small files help), matching the 'efficient with minor trimmable instances' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready templates with concrete commands — real pytest invocations ("pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v"), git add/commit commands, exact file-path placeholders, and a full plan-header template — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced (范围检查 → 文件结构 → 任务分解 → 自检 → 执行交接) with an explicit self-check checklist (规格覆盖度, 占位符扫描, 类型一致性), per-step FAIL→PASS validation, and a feedback loop ("如果发现问题，直接内联修复"; add tasks for uncovered requirements). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed — the skill is a self-contained methodology with well-organized section headers and only one-level references to sibling skills (subagent-driven-development, executing-plans, brainstorming), so well-organized sections fully satisfy progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |