Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete templates, code, commands, and anti-patterns, and its workflow has clear sequencing with validation checkpoints and a self-check feedback loop. Its main weaknesses are minor internal redundancy and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure via reference files.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the five micro-steps — keep them in the 任务结构 template and trim the standalone 小步骤任务粒度 list to a one-line reference, and state DRY/YAGNI/TDD once.
Extract the reusable 计划文档头部 and 任务结构 templates into a references/ file (e.g. references/plan-template.md) and link to it from the body to add one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, directive, and assumes competence ("假设他们是有经验的开发者"), but the "小步骤任务粒度" section duplicates the "任务结构" template's five steps and DRY/YAGNI/TDD is stated in both 概述 and 注意事项, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact file-path conventions, a full plan-header template, a complete task-structure template with executable test/impl code and git commit commands, and a specific 禁止占位符 anti-pattern list with named bad examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced (范围检查 → 文件结构 → 任务结构 → 自检 → 执行交接) with an explicit self-check checklist and a fix-and-continue feedback loop ("如果发现问题，直接内联修复"), plus the TDD write-run-implement-run-commit loop has validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the skill is monolithic with no bundle files and no one-level-deep references; the reusable plan-header and task-structure templates are content that could be split into reference files for easier navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |