Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable porting workflow with strong sequencing, explicit validation, and real error-recovery guidance. Its main gaps are minor: a missing worker.py code skeleton and slight repetition of the boundary rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and imperative throughout (e.g. 'Prefer subclassing the existing detection training base', 'Raise typed worker errors') with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the only trimmable redundancy is the don't-commit-target-code rule stated in both 'Keep The Boundary' and 'Add Generic Core Changes Only'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands are provided (the pytest invocation and the full CLI smoke-test command with real flags) plus the adapter directory layout and concrete rg search terms, but the core deliverable, worker.py, is described as a checklist rather than shown with a code skeleton. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced workflow (Ground The Work, Keep The Boundary, Build The Adapter, Generic Core Changes, Validate, Triage Failures) with explicit validation steps (focused tests, gated real-upstream tests, CLI smoke tests) and a dedicated feedback-loop section mapping import/eval/rendering failures to specific inspection steps. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-sectioned single-file skill with no bundle and no dangling references; at ~180 lines, some detail (full CLI examples, the triage matrix, the manifest field spec) could be split into reference files, which keeps it just short of the ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |