Content
42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an ambitious, carefully constructed formal contract, but it buries an actionable dialogical protocol inside a very long Lean 4 specification with duplicated judgment prose and no worked example of an actual round. Moving the formal block to a reference file, tightening the axiom comments, and adding one concrete sample surface would lift most dimensions.
Suggestions
Move the Lean 4 formal block to references/ (e.g. references/contract.md), keeping a short behavioral summary in SKILL.md, so the body reads as overview plus operational rules.
Add one worked example round — a seed intent, the surface it produces, the person's answer, and the resulting record/residual — since the current guidance describes the format but never demonstrates it.
Consolidate the long, partially overlapping axiom doc-comments (StandingSupported, Reaches, operative) into terse single statements; much of their qualification is repeated across Definition, MORPHISM, and TOOL GROUNDING.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body runs ~360 lines for a dialogical protocol, dominated by a ~250-line Lean 4 block whose axiom doc-comments repeat long judgment prose with heavy qualification (e.g. the StandingSupported comment restates proposer/standing rules three ways). It never explains concepts Claude already knows, so it is above the severely-padded anchor, but several sections are inflated well past lean and could be cut or tightened. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The TOOL GROUNDING `.surface` entry is genuinely concrete about what to present and in what order, and Mode Activation and Intensity give usable rules; however there is no worked example of an actual surface or round, and the operative workflow must be reconstructed from Lean-style recursion. This is some concrete guidance with key details missing rather than mostly-executable guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence exists (start → surface → read answer → converge → seam) spread across the FLOW/MORPHISM comments, the elicit definition, and the Protocol section, but it is scattered and implicit: the reader must parse the Lean recursion to derive the round structure, and checkpoints such as the AI-guided confirmation step are described only in prose. This matches the anchor for a present sequence with implicit or missing checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single reference (references/round-composition.md) exists, is one level deep, and is loaded on a clearly stated condition — good practice — but roughly 250 lines of formal specification that could live in a reference file are inlined into SKILL.md itself. Structure is present yet content that should be separate is inline, fitting the middle anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |