Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally well-executed orchestration skill: fully executable commands, a clearly sequenced 10-step workflow with validation gates and error-recovery loops, and tight token-efficient prose. The only structural improvement would be moving the large GraphQL query into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive throughout — every step adds operational specifics (e.g., 'gh issue view returns names but not label/milestone descriptions', 'Tests failing means the issue isn't done') with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; the GraphQL block is executable content, not padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: copy-paste-ready gh commands, a complete GraphQL query, `git issue <number>`, a fill-in implementer prompt template, and the exact announce-line format cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Ten explicitly sequenced steps with a ref-resolution fallback table, a hard review gate (Step 8), and explicit feedback loops for every failure mode (BLOCKED handling, findings back to the implementer, change requests looping through steps 8-9). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized step sections with clearly signaled cross-skill pointers, but at ~180 lines the 35-line GraphQL query is content that could live in a references/ file; the under-50-lines exception for a 5 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |