Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instructional skill with a clearly sequenced, well-validated workflow and a concrete output template that leaves no ambiguity about what to do. Its weaknesses are token efficiency — the auto-draft path is described twice, the Tips section restates body guidance, and the section bullets and template duplicate each other — and the absence of any progressive disclosure, with ~165 lines of section detail and template inlined in the main file.
Suggestions
Merge 'Sections to Capture' with the Step 3 template (or move the template to references/template.md) so each section is documented once, cutting the body roughly in half.
Delete the duplicated auto-draft instructions in Step 2 (they restate Step 1's option 1) and trim Tips entries that repeat body guidance like 'Capture exact words'.
Add one worked example of a filled-in section (e.g., a sample persona or customer-language row) to raise actionability and show the desired level of specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but real duplication exists: the auto-draft path is described in Step 1 ("You'll study the repo—README, landing pages, marketing copy... and draft a V1... After presenting the draft, ask: 'What needs correcting? What's missing?'") and again almost verbatim in Step 2 ("Read the codebase: README, landing pages, marketing copy... Present the draft and ask what needs correcting or is missing"), and the Tips entries ('Capture exact words', 'Validate as you go') restate guidance already given in the body. The rationale clause 'because they reflect how customers actually think and speak, which makes copy more resonant' explains something Claude can infer. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: exact storage path ('.claude/product-marketing.md'), legacy filename migration handling, verbatim questions ('What's the #1 frustration that brings them to you?'), an exact closing message, and a full copy-paste-ready document template. Minor gaps: no worked example of a filled-in section (e.g., a sample persona row) and no fallback guidance when the repo contains no marketing copy to draft from. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-step sequence (check existing → gather → create → confirm/save) with explicit validation loops: per-section 'Confirm accuracy', the tip 'Validate as you go: Summarize each section and confirm before moving on', the feedback loop 'Iterate until the user is satisfied', and a final 'Ask if anything needs adjustment' before saving. The 12-section list plus template doubles as a checklist; the operation is non-destructive so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single 235-line SKILL.md with no references/ bundle at all; the ~74-line 'Sections to Capture' bullets and the ~90-line full template — overlapping content covering the same 12 sections — are inlined where a split into a references/template.md would fit the overview-plus-reference pattern. Internal headers are clear, but the bulk detail belongs at one level of separation. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |