Screenshot capture, organization, and comparison for QA testing. Use when taking screenshots during test execution to ensure proper naming, organization, and traceability back to test cases.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jpoutrin/product-forge --skill qa-screenshot-management78
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Standardize screenshot capture and organization during QA testing.
qa-tests/
├── draft/ # QA test documents by status
├── active/
├── executed/
├── archived/
└── screenshots/
├── {test-id}/ # e.g., QA-20250105-001
│ ├── 01-initial-state.png # Numbered sequence
│ ├── 02-form-filled.png
│ ├── 03-success-state.png
│ └── elements/ # Extracted UI elements
│ ├── login-button.png
│ ├── email-field.png
│ └── password-field.png
├── baseline/ # Reference screenshots for comparison
│ └── {feature}/
│ └── {state}.png
└── failures/ # Failed test evidence
└── {date}/
└── {test-id}-{timestamp}.pngKey: Screenshots are stored in qa-tests/screenshots/{test-id}/ where {test-id} matches the QA test document name (e.g., QA-20250105-001).
{sequence}-{state-description}.{png|jpeg}01- through 99- for ordered stepsUse descriptive, kebab-case names:
| State | Example Filename |
|---|---|
| Initial page load | 01-initial-state.png |
| After form fill | 02-form-filled.png |
| Validation error | 03-validation-error.png |
| Success message | 04-success-message.png |
| Modal open | 05-modal-open.png |
| Dropdown expanded | 06-dropdown-expanded.png |
| Bad | Good |
|---|---|
screenshot1.png | 01-login-page-loaded.png |
test.png | 02-credentials-entered.png |
error.png | 03-invalid-password-error.png |
final.png | 04-dashboard-after-login.png |
Include metadata in test documentation:
### Screenshots
| # | Filename | Description | Step |
|---|----------|-------------|------|
| 1 | 01-initial-state.png | Login page before input | TC-001 Step 1 |
| 2 | 02-credentials-entered.png | Form with test credentials | TC-001 Step 2 |
| 3 | 03-dashboard-loaded.png | Dashboard after successful login | TC-001 Step 3 |// Full viewport
await page.screenshot({ path: 'screenshots/01-initial-state.png' });
// Full page (scrollable)
await page.screenshot({
path: 'screenshots/02-full-page.png',
fullPage: true
});// Specific element only
const element = page.locator('.error-message');
await element.screenshot({ path: 'screenshots/03-error-detail.png' });const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-');
await page.screenshot({
path: `screenshots/failure-${timestamp}.png`
});Create Baseline
screenshots/baseline/{feature}/Compare During Testing
| Type | Action |
|---|---|
| Dynamic content (dates, times) | Mask or ignore region |
| User-specific data | Use consistent test data |
| Animations | Wait for stable state |
| Random elements (ads) | Exclude from comparison |
When a test fails, capture:
screenshots/failures/2025-01-05/
├── QA-20250105-001-TC-002-1704456789.png # Actual state
├── QA-20250105-001-TC-002-expected.png # Expected (if applicable)
└── QA-20250105-001-TC-002-diff.png # Visual diff (if generated)Organize by browser when testing multiple browsers:
screenshots/{test-id}/
├── chrome/
│ ├── 01-initial-state.png
│ └── 02-final-state.png
├── firefox/
│ └── ...
└── safari/
└── ...Capture at standard breakpoints:
| Device | Width | Suffix |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 375px | -mobile |
| Tablet | 768px | -tablet |
| Desktop | 1280px | -desktop |
| Wide | 1920px | -wide |
Example:
01-homepage-mobile.png
01-homepage-tablet.png
01-homepage-desktop.png| Category | Retention |
|---|---|
| Passing tests | Delete after test run |
| Failing tests | Keep until issue resolved |
| Baselines | Keep in version control |
| Regression evidence | Keep 30 days minimum |
# Remove screenshots older than 30 days from failures
find qa-tests/screenshots/failures -mtime +30 -deleteReference screenshots in test execution logs:
## Test Execution Log
| Date | Tester | Result | Evidence |
|------|--------|--------|----------|
| 2025-01-05 | Jane | FAIL | [Screenshots](./screenshots/QA-20250105-001/) |When documenting accessibility issues:
Highlight Problem Area
Include Context
Document Fix Verification
0ebe7ae
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.