CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sync-feedback

Review and sync captured feedback to Product Forge

67

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/claude-code-dev/skills/sync-feedback/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is too brief and lacks explicit trigger guidance. While it mentions a specific product (Product Forge) which aids distinctiveness, it fails to explain what reviewing and syncing feedback actually involves or when Claude should use this skill over others.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause specifying trigger scenarios, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to upload, review, or synchronize user feedback with Product Forge'

Expand the capabilities with specific actions like 'categorize feedback', 'push updates', 'check sync status', or whatever concrete operations this skill performs

Include natural trigger terms users might say such as 'upload feedback', 'send to Product Forge', 'feedback sync', or 'product feedback'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('captured feedback', 'Product Forge') and two actions ('review', 'sync'), but lacks detail on what reviewing or syncing entails or what types of feedback are handled.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what at a basic level but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes 'feedback' and 'Product Forge' as relevant terms, but 'sync' and 'review' are generic. Missing natural variations users might say like 'upload feedback', 'send to Product Forge', or 'feedback management'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Product Forge' is a specific product name which helps distinctiveness, but 'review feedback' and 'sync' are generic enough to potentially overlap with other feedback or sync-related skills.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured command skill with excellent actionability and clear workflow documentation. The execution instructions are thorough with concrete examples and expected outputs. However, the skill is lengthy and could benefit from splitting detailed execution instructions into a separate reference file, and some content is repeated between the workflow diagram and execution sections.

Suggestions

Consider moving detailed 'Execution Instructions' to a separate EXECUTION.md file and keeping only the quick reference in the main skill

Remove the duplicate workflow representation - keep either the ASCII diagram or the numbered list in execution instructions, not both

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy (workflow shown twice - once as diagram, once in execution instructions) and could be tightened. The detailed execution instructions are necessary but some sections repeat information.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable commands, specific file paths, concrete output examples, and exact scripts to run. The execution instructions are copy-paste ready with clear bash commands and expected outputs.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear multi-step workflow with explicit sequence (enable → work → process → review → export). Status transitions are documented, and each mode has step-by-step instructions with validation points (e.g., 'Run /sync-feedback --review to review extracted feedback').

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-structured with clear sections, but the skill is quite long (monolithic) with detailed execution instructions that could potentially be split into separate reference files. All content is inline rather than using progressive disclosure to external files.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
jpoutrin/product-forge
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.