Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, validation-aware instruction skill with clear sequencing and good progressive disclosure. It is held back by repeated preservation-contract restatements and unexplained domain jargon that weakens conciseness and actionability.
Suggestions
State the memory/handoff/validation/approval/security preservation contract once (e.g. in Constraints) and reference it from other sections instead of restating it verbatim six times.
Define or replace opaque terms in Workflow step 5 ("steering-uptake mechanisms", "systems-thinking mechanisms", "zero-setup setup") with concrete, recognizable guidance or link to where each is defined.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is terse and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the memory/handoff/validation/approval/security preservation rule is restated roughly six times across Avoid, Workflow (steps 6 and 9), Constraints, Failure Mode, and Anti-Patterns, and could be consolidated. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete commands exist ("rg --files", "rg -n \"<command|path|handle>\" .", "pwd") and steps are specific, but workflow step 5 leans on unexplained jargon ("steering uptake", "systems-thinking mechanisms", "zero-setup setup") that is not executable without definitions. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 10-step Workflow is clearly sequenced, with an explicit Validation section, a fail-fast checkpoint ("stop at first failed gate"), and a fix-and-rerun feedback loop for the destructive shrink/delete operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A dedicated Progressive Disclosure section signals one-level-deep references to verified real files (references/agents-md-guidance.md, references/discovery-interview.md) and defers other bundle files to on-demand loading. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |