Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, lean runbook with a clear validated workflow, but it stops short of giving executable Biome commands and its deferred-reference path does not align with the actual bundled reference files. Tightening actionability and fixing the reference path would raise quality.
Suggestions
Add one or two concrete executable Biome commands (e.g. `biome check`, `biome lint --apply-unsafe`) so the guidance is copy-paste ready rather than process-level only.
Correct the Progressive Disclosure path to point at the actual bundle files in ./references/ (contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json), or link them explicitly, so navigation matches the real structure.
Remove the duplicated description line in the body (it repeats the frontmatter description verbatim) to reclaim tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — short bullet sections with no concept explanations Claude already knows; every section earns its place, though the opening line duplicates the frontmatter description. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Process guidance is concrete ('Inspect 2-3 focused surfaces', 'Stop at the first failed gate') but no actual Biome commands (e.g. `biome check`, `biome lint --apply`) are given, leaving execution details implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints ('Stop at the first failed gate', 'Rerun the relevant validation after fixes') and a fail-fast Validation section, matching the feedback-loop anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A Progressive Disclosure section signals deferred loading, but the referenced archived path does not match the actual bundle (files live in ./references/ as contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json), so references are present but not correctly signaled to the real files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |