Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable body for a complex multi-mode governance skill, with concrete commands, explicit validation feedback loops, and clean one-level-deep references. Only minor conciseness drift from a repeated truth-lane list.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the truth-lane list: enumerate the six lanes once in Outputs and reference them by name in Workflow step 6 and Validation rather than re-listing them.
Consider consolidating the near-duplicate 'do not infer completion' guidance from Failure Mode and Gotchas into one location to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and procedural with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the truth-lane enumeration (local_validation, generated_artifacts, remote_pr_checks, review_threads, tracker_state, merge_readiness) is repeated in both Outputs and Workflow step 6 and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact file names, a fully enumerated output YAML contract, and copy-paste-ready validation commands with environment variables and concrete script paths, covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 7-step workflow with explicit validation gates ('rerun the exact failed gate once', 'do not begin Worker work until check_goal_board.py passes') and clear stop conditions forms a proper validate-fix-retry feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear sectioned overview (When To Use, Inputs, Outputs, Workflow, Failure Mode, Validation, References) with one-level-deep references that each carry a descriptive one-liner; all referenced files (goal-contract.md, creation-and-continuation.md, markers.md, native-goal-runtime.md, session-evidence-closeout.md, implementation-notes-contract.md, evals.yaml) exist. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |