Content
46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-sectioned, but it functions as a stub: all operational substance is delegated to archived references that are absent from the bundle, leaving the executor with abstract directives and no way to follow them. Validation posture (fail-fast, observable criteria) is stated but generic, with no recovery loop.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (Infrastructure/references/contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json, subagent-routing.md, routing-map.json, assets/icons) at the paths the body links to, or inline the essential policy — currently every link is broken and 'load the archived full guide' has no target.
Make the procedure executable: add a concrete inspection checklist (what counts as hidden coupling, a missing checkpoint, an untreated risk), a template or example of the deepened-plan output, and the action to take after a failed gate besides stopping.
Trim the meta sections (Progressive Disclosure Entry preamble, 'Use', 'Philosophy') and deduplicate the subagent-routing pointers, which appear in both 'Full Context' and 'Subagent Routing'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short, bullet-driven, and assumes Claude's competence without explaining known concepts. Minor trimmable waste remains: the meta "Progressive Disclosure Entry" preamble, the near-empty "Use" section, and the subagent-routing link duplicated across "Full Context" and "Subagent Routing". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The procedure is high-level direction ("Inspect current plan for ambiguity", "Deepen task sequencing, validation strategy, and rollback posture") with no method, template, or example of a deepened plan, and the files that would carry the concrete detail (contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json, the "archived full guide") do not exist in the bundle — the "load the archived full guide" instruction points nowhere. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence exists and the Validation section includes an explicit fail-fast gate ("stop at first failed gate and do not proceed"), but the checkpoints are generic (no method for verifying "observable completion criteria"), there is no feedback loop beyond stopping, and the core step 2 is a single vague directive. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The entry-point shape is right — a concise SKILL.md with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references — but scored against the actual bundle, every referenced path is dangling: no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist, so contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json, subagent-routing.md, routing-map.json, and the icons are all unreachable and the disclosure structure is non-functional. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |