Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured runbook with strong validation feedback loops and a verified progressive-disclosure layout. The lone gap is the absence of named executable commands, which is acceptable for an instruction-only skill but keeps actionability just below the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A tight bullet-driven runbook with no concept over-explanation; every section earns its place and it assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete instructional guidance ("Start read-only by inspecting...", "Use the canonical bootstrap or repo wrapper") with clear disposition routing, though it stops short of naming specific executable commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflow is sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and a feedback loop ("If validation fails, fix only the smallest Project Brain surface... then rerun the same command"; "Fail fast: stop at first failed gate"). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview body with well-signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files (references/contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json all exist), plus a clearly labeled deferred-detail path. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |