Content
14%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a stub—it provides a one-line description and a single reference to an external file that is not included in the bundle. There are no actionable instructions, no workflow steps, no examples, and no concrete guidance for Claude to follow when performing skill reliability analysis. The content fails to deliver on its stated purpose of analyzing skill reliability and returning prioritized recommendations.
Suggestions
Add concrete workflow steps: describe how to scan session history, what patterns to look for (e.g., error types, frequency thresholds), and how to structure the output recommendations.
Include at least one concrete example showing sample input (e.g., a session log snippet) and expected output (e.g., a prioritized recommendation list with specific format).
Either inline the key content from contract.yaml or provide the bundle file so the reference is functional; a skill that is entirely dependent on an unavailable reference is not actionable.
Add validation/verification steps, such as how to confirm findings before making recommendations (e.g., minimum evidence thresholds, cross-referencing multiple sessions).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is very brief (only 3 lines of body), which is lean, but it's so sparse that it's hard to judge whether every token earns its place—the one-line description is somewhat vague rather than precisely informative. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | There are no concrete steps, commands, code examples, or specific instructions. The entire actionable content is deferred to a referenced file (contract.yaml) that is not provided in the bundle, leaving the skill body with no executable guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no workflow, no sequenced steps, no validation checkpoints, and no description of how to perform the analysis or generate recommendations. The task involves multi-step analysis (scanning sessions, identifying failures, prioritizing recommendations) but none of this is articulated. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references ./references/contract.yaml but no bundle files are provided, meaning the reference is unverifiable and potentially broken. There is no other structure, no overview content, and the entire skill is essentially a stub pointing to a single file. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |