Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately concise and well-structured as a pointer skill, but it sacrifices actionability and workflow clarity by offloading all procedural detail to the referenced template without sequencing the core steps.
Suggestions
Add a brief sequenced outline of the core steps (e.g., gather session context → interview user → fill template → validate artifact) so the workflow is visible without opening the reference.
Include one concrete validation checkpoint or command for the "validated skill artifact" step to lift workflow clarity above a pointer-only body.
Provide at least one executable snippet or concrete fill-in instruction inline so the body instructs rather than only describes the conversion.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean two-line overview plus a single signaled reference; it assumes Claude's competence with no padding, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | "Convert a completed workflow into a reusable skill package with explicit invoke syntax" describes the goal rather than instructing, and concrete guidance is limited to a link to the template, leaving key execution details in the reference. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No sequenced steps or validation checkpoint appear in the body — it is a pointer — yet the skill's own description implies a multi-step intake/interview/write/validate process that is not surfaced here. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line single-purpose skill, the body is a clear overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep reference to the real file ./references/skill-template.md, matching the simple-skills allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |