CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

talk-birgitta-closing-keynote

Answers questions about, retrieves safe excerpts from, explains concepts from, and summarizes key arguments in Birgitta Böckeler's talk "State of Play: AI Coding Assistants" (AI Native Dev conference, 2026). Use when the user asks about the last 12 months in AI coding assistants, model-task fit, LLM statelessness, context window and attention trade-offs, coding harnesses, harness engineering/context engineering, skills/MCP/sub-agents/plugins/hooks, guide-and-sensor feedback loops, background agents and swarms, review bottlenecks, AI coding costs, cognitive surrender, or risk-based supervision of coding agents.

69

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured instruction-only skill with concise, actionable, sequenced guidance and grounding rules acting as checkpoints. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the entire workflow depends on referenced files (outline.md, transcript.md, quote.md, quotes.md) that are not present in the bundle.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced bundle files (outline.md, transcript.md, quote.md/quotes.md) under references/ so the skill's navigation points to real content; consolidate quote.md and quotes.md into one file to avoid duplication.

Add one or two short worked examples (a sample question with the expected cited answer format) to lift actionability and workflow clarity.

Add an explicit error-recovery feedback loop for the grounding rules (e.g., 'if no source lines match, broaden the outline search or state the gap') to strengthen workflow_clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and purposeful with no padding explaining general concepts Claude already knows; only minor trim opportunities remain (e.g., referencing both quote.md and quotes.md for the same purpose). Not a 5 because the summary paragraph and anchor list could be marginally tighter.

4 / 5

Actionability

Gives concrete, executable guidance such as 'read outline.md to locate the relevant section, then read that section of transcript.md' and 'Cite by L#### source line range', with numbered workflows per task type. Not a 5 because there are no worked example answers showing the expected output format.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each task type has a clearly sequenced numbered workflow, and the grounding rules act as validation checkpoints (e.g., 'If a claim is not in transcript.md, say so explicitly'). Not a 5 because there are no explicit error-recovery feedback loops.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

References to outline.md, transcript.md, quote.md, and quotes.md are clearly signaled and one level deep, but no bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent), so the navigation points to missing files. This structure could be better organized by actually shipping the referenced materials.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it states multiple concrete actions, provides an extensive natural-language trigger list, answers both what and when, and occupies a distinct niche. Third-person voice is maintained throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists four concrete actions ('Answers questions about, retrieves safe excerpts from, explains concepts from, and summarizes key arguments in') scoped to a clearly named talk, matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' (answers/retrieves/explains/summarizes about the talk) and 'when' (a long concrete 'Use when the user asks about...' clause), matching the both-what-and-when anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when...' clause enumerates many natural trigger phrases (model-task fit, LLM statelessness, context window and attention trade-offs, coding harnesses, guide-and-sensor feedback loops, review bottlenecks, cognitive surrender) including synonyms, matching comprehensive keyword coverage.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It targets a single named talk by a named speaker, a clear niche with highly specific triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
jscraik/Agent-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.