Use when the user asks about Justin Cormack's AI Native DevCon talk on tests, observability, AI-generated behavior, evidence, instrumentation, and keeping AI systems honest when test signals are incomplete.
64
78%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./Plugins/aidevcon/skills/talk-cormack-tests-lie-observability-ai/SKILL.mdJustin Cormack argues that tests can give false confidence for AI-shaped systems, so teams need observability, instrumentation, and evidence beyond pass/fail checks to understand behavior.
outline.md first to locate the relevant section or concept.quote.md for short supporting excerpts, then verify against transcript.md when precision matters.Answer from the bundled files. Use short excerpts only when they clarify the answer, and cite the transcript line IDs when available.
When the user asks how to apply the talk, identify the matching concept from the outline, summarize the relevant transcript evidence, and adapt it to the user's context. Mark anything beyond the talk as your own recommendation.
When comparing this talk with another AI Native DevCon session, ground this talk's side in outline.md and quote.md before drawing connections.
f1f2f21
Also appears in
on Jun 8, 2026
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.