Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized reference skill body: lean, instruction-dense, with clearly sequenced workflows, concrete output templates, and explicit handling of redacted-content requests. The main weakness is that the core factual workflow leans on bundle files (outline.md, quote.md, transcript.md) that are absent from the provided bundle, weakening both executability and the otherwise well-structured progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (outline.md, quote.md, transcript.md) alongside SKILL.md, or remove the Read Order references if the files are not distributed — the factual-question workflow cannot be executed without outline.md and quote.md.
Add an explicit output-quality checkpoint to the workflows (e.g., after answering a factual question, verify the answer stayed within 2-5 sentences and used the redacted bundle only) to close the workflow_clarity gap.
Trim the Examples section's "Response shape" lines, which restate guidance already covered by the Output Templates and Core Workflow sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — every section (Read Order, Core Workflow, Output Templates, Examples) carries instructions. Minor trim potential remains (the Examples section's "Response shape" lines partially duplicate the Output Templates), so it sits at efficient-with-minor-over rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is mostly executable: numbered workflow steps, output templates with named fields (Goal, Boundaries, Review points, Evidence, Open questions), and concrete handling of redacted requests. The gap keeping it below 5 is that the factual workflow's first step ("Identify the relevant concept from `outline.md`") depends on bundle files that are not present in the provided bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly sequenced numbered workflows with a coverage checkpoint ("State when the bundle does not cover a requested detail") and an explicit boundary rule for operational-mechanics requests. No destructive or batch operations, so no validation cap applies; it misses 5 only because the workflows lack an explicit verify-output step beyond that coverage check. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Read Order section signals one-level-deep references (`outline.md`, `quote.md`, `transcript.md`) with a clear per-file purpose, which matches good structure. However, scoring against the actual bundle structure as instructed: none of the three referenced files exist in the provided bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), so the navigation cannot be fully verified — keeping it below the anchor 5 easy-navigation bar. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |