Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured reference-skill router: concrete, sequenced instructions per task type with strong validation and failure-handling checkpoints, and a clean one-level-deep reference design. The main deductions are mild redundancy across sections repeating the outline→transcript→quote pattern already covered by grounding rules, and the fact that the referenced source files are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the outline→transcript→safe-excerpt pattern: the grounding rules at the top already define it, so each task section can reference it once instead of restating 'read outline.md, read transcript.md, quote safe excerpts' in five variations — this also fixes the 'a **safe excerpts**' grammar slip.
Ship or point to the referenced bundle files: `outline.md`, `transcript.md`, and `quote.md` are named as the core workflow but are absent from the skill bundle; either include them (e.g. in `references/`) or state their paths so the navigation instructions resolve.
Consider giving one worked example of a properly cited answer (a quoted excerpt plus its transcript line range) so the 'cite by transcript line range' and 'quote short, non-sensitive excerpts' rules have a concrete template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean router for a reference skill with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the grounding rules already state "read `outline.md` to locate the relevant section, then read that section of `transcript.md`" and "quote short, non-sensitive excerpts", and the five task sections each restate that pattern (e.g. "Read the corresponding range of `transcript.md`", "Answer using **safe excerpts** from `transcript.md"), which could be tightened into one shared step. Minor grammar noise ("a **safe excerpts** of how Marsden articulates the framework") also trims poorly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each task type has fully executable, specific instructions: "Use `outline.md` → \"Named frameworks / concepts\"" to find a framework, walk audit dimensions "in this order: local-vs-centralized; IDE-or-not; task-scaling-vs-org-scaling...", give "a clear verdict (covered / partial / missing)", and "check `quote.md` first" before the transcript. As an instruction-only skill, the guidance is concrete and covers the common cases (apply, audit, Q&A, proactive surfacing, teaching). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Every section is a numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and failure handling: "If a claim isn't in `transcript.md`, say 'the talk doesn't address this'", "If the user hasn't described their state for a dimension, ask before scoring", "If the framework genuinely doesn't fit the user's situation, say so", and "If the answer genuinely isn't in the transcript, say so explicitly". These feedback loops prevent the main failure modes (inventing attributions, over-citing, stretching frameworks). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (`outline.md`, `transcript.md`, `quote.md`) and explicit navigation into them (e.g. "`quote.md` contains pre-extracted safe highlights... check `quote.md` first"), which matches the 5 anchor's structure. However, none of the three referenced files exist in the provided bundle (no `references/`, `scripts/`, or `assets/` directories and no such files alongside SKILL.md), so the references dangle — a structural gap that keeps this at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |