CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

talk-sloan-harness-engineering-beyond-code

Summarizes Rob Sloan's harness-engineering talk and creates safe design artifacts for agent context beyond code: product-intent packets, design constraints, acceptance criteria, context ownership, and review gates. Use when the user asks about making non-code context agent-ready or improving AI work with product/design intent.

69

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Harness Engineering Beyond Code

Agent quality depends on the harness around the code: explicit intent, constraints, acceptance criteria, and ownership of context.

Read Order

  1. Use outline.md for the talk thesis, concept map, and safe application boundaries.
  2. Use quote.md when the answer needs a short supporting excerpt.
  3. Use transcript.md only to confirm what remained after safety redaction.
  4. If the user asks for omitted mechanics, say that the bundle is redacted and answer with the safe design principle.

What This Skill Produces

  • context packet
  • acceptance-criteria checklist
  • design-constraint summary
  • harness audit

Core Workflow

When answering a factual question:

  1. Identify the relevant concept from outline.md.
  2. Answer in 2-5 sentences.
  3. Add one short excerpt from quote.md only if it strengthens the answer.
  4. State when the bundle does not cover a requested detail.

When applying the talk to the user's work:

  1. State the product intent in one paragraph.
  2. List non-code constraints separately from code constraints.
  3. Turn vague goals into acceptance criteria.
  4. Name the owner of each context area.
  5. Define review gates before agent output is accepted.

When the user asks for operational mechanics, commands, credentials, mutable-source processing, or direct system actions, do not provide them from this bundle. Give the design-level alternative instead.

Output Templates

Summary

  • Thesis:
  • Key concepts: <3-5 bullets>
  • Practical takeaway:

Design Artifact

  • Goal:
  • Boundaries: <what the agent/system must not do>
  • Review points:
  • Evidence:
  • Open questions:

Redacted Request

  • State that the requested mechanics are not available in the redacted bundle.
  • Explain the risk in neutral terms.
  • Provide a safe checklist or conceptual design instead.

Examples

User: What context should I give an agent? Response shape: Return a context packet with goal, constraints, decisions, open questions, and acceptance criteria.

User: Can you connect to our design tool? Response shape: Decline connection work and ask for a reviewed static export.

Repository
jscraik/Agent-Skills
Last updated
First committed

Also appears in

AINativeDev/aidevcon-2026-ldn
Modified

on Aug 4, 2026

ainativedev/aidevcon-2026-ldn
Modified

on Jun 4, 2026

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.