Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, actionable, well-sequenced reference skill body whose main weakness is progressive disclosure: it directs the agent to bundle files that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship outline.md, quote.md, and transcript.md in ./references/ so the referenced disclosure chain actually resolves, or document where these files are materialized at runtime.
Tighten or remove the "Core Concepts" bullet list, which restates facets already in the description, to recover a few tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence—it gives grounding and safety rules without padding or explaining concepts Claude already knows; the only minor trim is the "Core Concepts" list, which lightly overlaps the description. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific ("Read outline.md first", "Use quote.md for short supporting excerpts, then verify against transcript.md", "cite the transcript line IDs when available"), providing mostly executable procedural direction with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear grounding sequence (outline → quote → verify against transcript) is given, with a verification checkpoint in rule 4 ("If the transcript does not support a claim, say that the talk does not address it"); no destructive or batch operations apply, so the cap is not triggered. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled and one-level-deep, but the referenced bundle files (outline.md, quote.md, transcript.md) are absent from the ./references/ bundle, so the disclosure chain an agent would follow is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |