workflow-guardrail-candidates

Binary calibration pack for recurring workflow guardrail recommendations.

Quality

48%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./codex/agents/evals/workflow-guardrail-candidates/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is admirably concise and well-organized as a directory map, but it offers no executable guidance and references several paths that do not exist in the bundle. This weakens both actionability and navigability despite the lean structure.

Suggestions

Add a brief 'How to run' or 'Quick start' step with a concrete command for executing the eval runner against tessl.json, so the skill is actionable rather than purely descriptive.

Fix the Layout references to match the actual bundle: remove or create evals/, tessl.json, and workflow-guardrail-candidates.json, or point to the real files under references/.

Add a one-line note on what Claude should do with this pack (e.g. route a claim to a case via references/evals.yaml and score against calibration expectations) to give the map a clear workflow.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is a lean layout map with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line describes a concrete file and its role, fitting the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.	5 / 5
Actionability	It only describes which files hold what ('references/evals.yaml holds the claim-to-case routing'), providing high-level hints with no concrete commands, code, or specific steps to execute, matching the score-2 anchor.	2 / 5
Workflow Clarity	As a simple under-50-line skill the layout is clearly organized, but it describes directory structure rather than an actual sequenced process, so it sits below the score-5 'clear and well-organized' bar and just above the score-3 'sequence present but checkpoints missing' anchor.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The Layout section clearly signals references, but 3 of the 4 referenced paths (evals/, tessl.json, workflow-guardrail-candidates.json) do not exist in the bundle, so navigation effectively breaks, fitting the score-2 'minimal structure / references buried or broken' anchor better than score-3.	2 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

37%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and names a specific domain, but it states only what the pack is without any concrete actions or a 'Use when...' trigger clause. This leaves trigger guidance and completeness underspecified for reliable skill selection.

Suggestions

Add a concrete action verb phrase, e.g. 'Calibrates and validates recurring workflow guardrail recommendations' to replace the static noun-phrase framing.

Append an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases a user would say (e.g. 'Use when calibrating workflow guardrail recommendations or validating guardrail eval cases').

Include common synonyms or file/type cues (e.g. 'guardrail evals', 'calibration pack') to improve trigger-term coverage and distinctiveness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ('workflow guardrail recommendations') but is a noun phrase describing what the artifact is ('Binary calibration pack'), with no concrete actions, matching the 'names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' anchor.	2 / 5
Completeness	It gives a clear 'what' but has no 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 3; the 'when' is only weakly implied by 'recurring'.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	'Binary calibration pack' and 'recurring' are technical jargon with only one or two generic keywords ('workflow guardrail'), missing the natural phrases a user would actually say, fitting the score-2 anchor.	2 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	'Workflow guardrail recommendations' is a somewhat specific niche but could still overlap with other eval/calibration/guardrail skills, matching the score-3 anchor rather than the clearly distinct score-4.	3 / 5
	Total	10 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: jscraik/Agent-Skills
Path: codex/agents/evals/workflow-guardrail-candidates/SKILL.md
Commit: b3478dc

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.