Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced dispatch procedure with concrete API operations, error handling, and a confirmation gate. Showing the full request body shape and an explicit fix-retry loop would round out actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Include a short example of the full slash.run request body (not just body.command) so the request envelope is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validate-and-retry step: if slash.run returns an error or non-acceptance, surface the error and retry with corrected input rather than only checking before reporting.
Optionally show one or two concrete intent-to-command mappings (e.g. 'site sync' -> the resolved command) to make natural-language resolution more actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | About 30 lean lines with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; each line (e.g. 'retired command tools and MCP aliases do not exist') earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete operations are specified (slash.list, plugin.capabilities, slash.run with body.command) and a real example ('/sites disable 3') is given, but the full request envelope/shape is not shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with validation checkpoints (confirmation gate, checking returned acceptance/result, no-match reporting) is present; the destructive-operation cap is avoided because validation exists, but there is no explicit fix-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files and a well-organized numbered structure; the simple-skill exception applies and no external references are needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |