Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with strong validation gates and executable commands. Weakest only on conciseness and progressive disclosure, where some internal script-mechanics and operational rules are spelled out inline rather than delegated to the script files or a reference doc.
Suggestions
Trim or relocate the detailed log-relevance/compaction rules (steps 2) into the collect script's --help or a reference file, since Claude can read that behavior from the script; keep only the rule that matters to Claude (verify retained boundary records).
Move the allowed-values and evidence-to-repo routing tables into a short reference file and link to it, so the SKILL.md body stays a lean overview pointing to scripts/ and references/.
Optionally tighten the submit-step prose by collapsing the enumerated reason list into a table mapping reason -> action, reducing token cost while preserving the decision logic.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and well-organized with tables and executable blocks, but sections describing the scripts' internal behavior (log compaction, keyword normalization, repetition counts) over-explain mechanics Claude could read from the scripts themselves, keeping it just below the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready script invocations with concrete flags, complete JSON draft templates for both bug and feature-request cases, allowed-value tables, exact confirmation phrasing, and enumerated submit result reasons—fully executable across the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: stop on 'no_explicit_feedback_intent', reject-and-ask on prepare failure, revise keywords and re-collect when previews mismatch, and block submit until the user explicitly replies '确认/confirm'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with one-level-deep references to real scripts in scripts/ (all three referenced files exist), but substantial operational detail (log-relevance rules, allowed-value tables) is inlined in the overview rather than externalized to reference files, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |