Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clearly structured RIA skill body with concrete executable steps, completion criteria, and a safety boundary. It loses points on conciseness due to duplicated frontmatter content and audit metadata, and on progressive disclosure due to a dangling test-results.md reference.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated 'A2 触发场景/语言信号' and '相关 skills' sections that restate the frontmatter Triggers and related_skills, or replace them with a one-line pointer.
Delete the '审计信息' block (验证通过/测试通过率/蒸馏时间) — it is build metadata unrelated to executing the skill.
Either create the referenced test-results.md under references/ or drop the '见 test-results.md' pointer to avoid a dangling reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the A2 trigger list and '相关 skills' section duplicate the frontmatter, and the trailing '审计信息' (验证通过/测试通过率/蒸馏时间) is meta-noise that does not help execution. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives concrete steps with explicit 完成标准 ('写下当前所有…欲望，标出其中1个重大欲望', '记录1天里…时间比例') and a 判停条件, which is actionable instruction-only guidance with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four steps are clearly sequenced with per-step completion criteria, a stop-condition checkpoint for clinical depression, and a weekly-review feedback loop; not quite a full error-recovery checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file organized into clear R/I/A1/A2/E/B sections; no bundle files exist, but the body references test-results.md which is not present in the bundle — a minor dangling reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |