CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

identity-work

当用户发现自己在为立场辩护、看不清现实、或反复立志却改变不了自己时调用。 核心理念: 身份是认知牢笼也是行为杠杆——放下身份才能看清真相(痛苦=真相时刻), 更新自我形象才能替代自律(对外承诺)。 不适用于: 需要专业心理咨询的深层创伤。 Triggers: 立场/身份/自我/看不清现实/改变不了自己/自律失败/identity/self-image

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./books/naval-almanack-skill/identity-work/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, mostly lean instruction-only skill whose E section delivers concrete actionable steps with completion criteria and a safety stop-condition. The chief gaps are the absence of worked examples and an error-recovery feedback loop, plus a quotable source block that could be tightened.

Suggestions

Add one short worked example in the E section (e.g. a sample filled-in belief audit or a concrete identity declaration) to lift actionability toward fully copy-paste-ready guidance.

Add a brief validate→fix→retry loop in the workflow for cases where a step stalls (e.g. what to do if no belief surfaces in step 1, or if the public announcement meets pushback in step 3).

Trim the R (原文) quote to the single sentence that anchors the methodology, since the rest is restated in the I section, to improve token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a lean methodology distillation with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only minor trim opportunity is the length of the R (原文) quote block, so it lands at 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

The E section gives concrete steps with explicit 完成标准 ('列出3条成捆一致的信念', '向至少3人宣布', '30天每天做一个与新身份一致的小动作') and a 判停条件, but it lacks worked examples (a filled-in belief audit or identity declaration), so it is mostly but not fully executable guidance.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 4-step sequence (信念审计→找真相入口→声明新身份→用行为回填) with completion criteria and a stop-condition checkpoint for deep trauma; not a 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (validate→fix→retry) for when a step fails.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file with clear, well-labeled R/I/A1/A2/E/B sections and no nested external references; with no bundle files present the structure is good and easy to navigate, though it is over 50 lines so the simple-skill 5 exception does not apply.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-constructed description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with natural user-language keywords and an explicit non-applicability boundary. Its main limitation is that the described actions are conceptual mechanisms rather than concrete operations, and it shares some trigger space with adjacent self-work skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the identity-work domain and two core mechanisms ('放下身份才能看清真相', '更新自我形象才能替代自律'), but these are framed as abstract conceptual levers rather than concrete operations, so it sits at the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor rather than the comprehensive 5.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what (核心理念: 身份是认知牢笼也是行为杠杆) and when ('当用户发现自己在为立场辩护…时调用' plus a dedicated Triggers line), and adds a 不适用于 boundary, matching the 'clearly and explicitly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases' anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The Triggers line lists natural phrases users would actually say ('为立场辩护/看不清现实/改变不了自己/自律失败') plus English 'identity/self-image', giving good coverage; not a 5 because a few common synonyms/phrasings are absent and no scoping extension applies.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The trigger phrases (立场辩护, 看不清现实, 改变不了自己) carve a fairly distinct niche and the 不适用于 clause reduces misfires, but the related_skills (acceptance, self-liberation) indicate minor overlap risk with closely adjacent skills, keeping it just below 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
kangarooking/cangjie-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.