Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable distillation of a book chapter with concrete execution steps, completion criteria, and explicit boundaries. Its main weakness is token efficiency — duplicated related-skill listings and audit metadata add tokens without aiding execution.
Suggestions
Remove the「审计信息」block (验证通过/测试通过率/蒸馏时间) and the duplicated「相关 skills (阶段 3 定稿)」section from the body since both are metadata already captured in frontmatter; they add tokens without aiding execution.
Either create the referenced test-results.md or drop the「见 test-results.md」pointer so the body has no dangling references.
Tighten the R-section quote to the single sentence that anchors the methodology (the 'five chimpanzees' prediction) rather than retaining the full passage, reducing the longest padded block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The R/I/A1/A2/E/B core is dense and assumes Claude's competence, but it carries unnecessary tokens: a duplicated「相关 skills」block (also in frontmatter) and an「审计信息」metadata block (验证通过 V1/V2/V3, 测试通过率, 蒸馏时间) that does not aid execution, placing it at 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives concrete executable steps with completion criteria — 「列出最常接触的 5 人，逐个标积极/消极/中性」 and「对每个消极关系选一：改造/边界/切割」 — and the A1 cases supply worked examples, leaving only minor gaps versus the fully copy-paste-ready 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four numbered steps with per-step 完成标准 and an explicit 判停条件 in step 3 (「若对方是亲属/同事无法切割，改为设置接触边界」) form a clear sequence with most checkpoints present; it is a non-destructive advisory skill so the validation cap does not apply, but checkpoints are implicit rather than fully spelled-out validation, keeping it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~100-line body is well-organized under a clear R/I/A1/A2/E/B framework with all content appropriately inlined in a single file; the dangling「见 test-results.md」reference is a minor organization gap that prevents the clean one-level-deep 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |