Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill that distills a book chapter into a usable framework with concrete completion criteria and a feedback loop. It is token-efficient and clearly navigable, with only minor redundancy between the frontmatter and body.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated '相关 skills' section from the body since it already appears in the frontmatter related_skills, or keep only the body version with the distinction rationale.
Tighten the E section by adding an explicit checkpoint for step 2 (e.g. '若候选都不可规模化，回到步骤1扩大候选') to match the feedback loop already present in step 1.
Move the '审计信息' block (验证通过/测试通过率/蒸馏时间) out of the body or into a comment, as it is process metadata not needed at runtime.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, distilling Naval's framework rather than explaining generic concepts; the only padding is the duplicate '相关 skills' block (already in frontmatter) and the audit metadata, which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives concrete steps with explicit completion criteria ('完成标准') and stop conditions ('判停条件'), e.g. '列出 3–5 个...并问身边人交叉验证' and '30 天内发布一个最小作品'; minor gaps remain in specifying how to test scalability. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (盘点→检验→定义→重定义) with an explicit retry/feedback loop in step 1 ('若找到的事可以被培训...回到步骤 1'); not a destructive/batch operation, so no validation cap applies, but a couple of checkpoints are implicit rather than stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized SKILL.md with clear R/I/A1/A2/E/B section headers and no nested references; as a simple instruction-only skill this is appropriate, though the inlined audit block and repeated related-skills list add minor noise. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |