Conciseness

The body is mostly tight and assumes Claude's competence (no explaining of what dopamine or screen time is), but carries clear padding: the related-skills list appears twice (frontmatter and 「## 相关 skills (阶段 3 定稿)」), the 「## 审计信息」 section (V1/V2/V3 checks, 「测试通过率: 见 test-results.md」, 「蒸馏时间: 2026-08-01」) is process metadata irrelevant to executing the skill, and the A1 case narratives retell book anecdotes. This matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' — below 4 because several sections (audit info, duplicated related-skills) earn no place, above 2 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows.

Actionability

The E section gives four concrete steps, each with a measurable 完成标准 ('记录 3 天，标出最痛的 1 个消费型 app/时段', '告诉 3 个朋友你的戒断目标') plus a quantified 判停条件 ('若 7 天后复发 ≥3 次，缩小目标'). This is mostly executable guidance with minor gaps — some steps leave the actual action loose ('为每个触发时段…准备一个非屏幕替代') and no example dialogue or concrete plan template is provided — matching anchor 4; it is below 5 because a few instructions remain directional rather than copy-paste ready, and above 3 because everything is real guidance, not pseudocode.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced, each has an explicit 完成标准 checkpoint, and step 4 includes a feedback loop ('若 7 天后复发 ≥3 次，缩小目标…不责备自己') for error recovery. It matches 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' — below 5 because there is no explicit gating between steps (no 'only proceed when…') and no recovery guidance for steps 1–3 (e.g., what if screen-time stats are unavailable); above 3 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are clearly headed and well-organized, but this is a ~100-line monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle: content that would belong in separate files is inlined (the R source quote, the A1 case studies, the A2 trigger scenarios), and the one reference it does make — 「测试通过率: 见 test-results.md」 — points to a file that does not exist in the bundle. This matches 'Some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline'; it is above 2 because the headers make navigation genuinely easy, and below 4 because there is no working one-level-deep reference structure at all plus a dangling reference.

Specificity

The description names the domain (screen/dopamine detox) and one or two concrete actions — 「用习惯替换五步戒断」 (five-step habit-replacement detox) and 「区分工作屏幕与消费屏幕」 — but never enumerates what the skill actually does for the user (quantify usage, redesign environment, substitute activities). This matches the anchor 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'; it is below 4 because no list of several specific capabilities is present, and above 2 because the actions named are not merely generic.

Completeness

Both parts are present: an explicit use-when clause (「当用户刷手机/短视频/社交媒体上瘾、感觉空虚、想戒断多巴胺零食时调用」 plus a Triggers line) and a 'what' via 「核心理念: …用习惯替换五步戒断」. It falls short of 5 because the 'what' is framed as source-book philosophy rather than a concrete statement of what the skill does (e.g., guides the user through a five-step habit-replacement plan); it is above 3 because the 'when' is fully explicit with concrete trigger phrases, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

The explicit trigger list 「刷手机/上瘾/短视频/社交媒体/多巴胺/戒断/屏幕时间/screen time/dopamine/addiction」 covers the natural phrases a user would actually say in both Chinese and English. It is below 5 because common variations are missing (doomscrolling, 熬夜刷手机, 戒掉, phone addiction), and above 3 because coverage is broad and includes natural colloquial terms like 刷手机 rather than only jargon.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is clear (screen-consumption addiction, not general habits or work screen use) and the explicit exclusion 「不适用于: 工作需要屏幕的职业场景」 reduces overlap with adjacent skills. It is below 5 because terms like 上瘾/戒断/dopamine could plausibly fire for adjacent skills (meditation, general habit change) without the skill-level disambiguation that only appears in the body, and above 3 because the consumption-vs-work boundary is stated in the description itself.