Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with clear steps and a retry condition, but it carries redundant case-study and meta sections that dilute token efficiency.
Suggestions
Trim or collapse the A1 case studies and the trailing '相关 skills'/'审计信息' sections, which duplicate the frontmatter and add little executable value.
Add an explicit completion/validation checkpoint to steps 1–3 (e.g., '确认已记录满 3 天数据再进入下一步') to mirror the step-4 feedback loop and raise workflow clarity.
Consider moving the methodology detail (I section) and case studies into a reference file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview pointing one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but includes padding: the A1 case studies and the duplicated '相关 skills'/'审计信息' sections restate frontmatter content and could be tightened, and the R quote is somewhat long. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives concrete, measurable steps with 完成标准 ('记录 3 天', '告诉 3 个朋友', '移出首屏/卸载/设限额'), matching mostly-executable guidance with only minor coverage gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 1→4 sequence with an explicit feedback loop in step 4 (判停条件: '若 7 天后复发 ≥3 次，缩小目标'); steps 1–3 lack explicit validation checkpoints, so it is not a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized R/I/A/E/B sections in a single file with no nested references; over 50 lines with inlined case studies keeps it just below a 5 rather than at the simple-skill ceiling. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |