Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured conceptual skill: the I section gives a crisp five-part framework, the A1 cases ground it, and the E section is unusually actionable with per-step completion criteria, a stop-condition, and a quarterly review loop. Remaining issues are minor: trimmable audit/meta sections, a duplicated related-skills list, and a dangling reference to a nonexistent test-results.md.
Suggestions
Trim the audit section and the '(阶段 3 定稿)' label, and drop the duplicate related-skills list in the body since the frontmatter already records the same relations — this tightens conciseness toward anchor 5.
Remove or fix the dangling "见 test-results.md" reference (the file does not exist in the bundle), or move the audit metadata into that file so navigation is accurate.
Add a brief validation cue to steps 1, 3, and 4 of the E section (e.g., how to verify the three red lines were actually written down, or what to do if no leverage layer can be identified) to give every step a checkpoint like step 2's stop-condition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and structured with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but it includes trimmable meta-content: the audit section ("验证通过: V1 ✓ / V2 ✓ / V3 ✓ (v02)", "蒸馏时间: 2026-08-01"), the "(阶段 3 定稿)" label, and a related-skills list that duplicates the frontmatter — minor over-content that could be trimmed (anchor 4, not the every-token-earns-its-place of anchor 5). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the E section is fully actionable: each step has explicit completion criteria ("回答三个问题——收入是否按时间计？有无产权…？有几层杠杆？"), concrete example actions ("要期权、做产品、写内容、入股"), a written deliverable ("明确写下…三条红线"), and a review cadence ("每季度检查") — specific, executable guidance covering the common cases, matching anchor 5 for non-code skills. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four E steps are clearly sequenced with per-step completion criteria acting as checkpoints, and step 2 includes an explicit feedback loop ("判停条件: 若下一步涉及孤注一掷…跳过该动作并回到步骤 2") — a clear sequence with most checkpoints present. It falls short of anchor 5 because steps 1, 3, and 4 have no validation or error-recovery guidance of their own, only completion criteria. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a single-file skill (~104 lines) it is well organized into clear R/I/A1/A2/E/B sections with no content that clearly belongs in separate files, but it is over the ~50-line simple-skill threshold and contains a dangling reference — "测试通过率: 见 test-results.md" points to a file that does not exist in the bundle — a minor navigation/organization gap that keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |