Conciseness

The body is four lines of lean, executable commands with one short annotation each ("ensure dependencies are installed", "install the CLI locally") and a single error-recovery sentence — no concept explanations or padding. It matches anchor 5 ('Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place') rather than 4, which would require minor over-explanation to trim.

Actionability

All three steps are copy-paste-ready commands (`cd cli && uv sync`, `cd cli && uv tool install --editable .`, `cd cli && uv run planoai --help`) covering the full build-install-verify flow. This matches anchor 5 ('Fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands') — anchor 4 would imply minor gaps, and none are present.

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 3: `uv run planoai --help`) and a feedback loop ("If the build or install fails, diagnose and fix the issues") matching anchor 5 ('Clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'). The operation is not destructive or batch, so no cap applies; anchor 4 would require a missing checkpoint, which step 3 provides.

Progressive Disclosure

This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist) and no external references needed; the numbered-list structure is well-organized for the content's size. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, this matches anchor 5 — a wall-of-text or inline-content-that-belongs-elsewhere (anchors 1-2) clearly does not apply to a 4-line body.

Specificity

"Build and install the Python CLI (planoai)" names the domain (Python CLI, planoai) and exactly two concrete actions (build, install). It matches anchor 3 ('Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive') — not 4 because it does not list several actions (verification, dependency sync, uninstall are only in the body), and not 2 because the actions are concrete rather than generic.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both: what ("Build and install the Python CLI (planoai)") and when ("Use after making changes to cli/ code to install locally"), matching the anchor-4 example pattern ('Extract text from PDFs and fill forms. Use when working with PDF files.'). Not 5 because the 'when' clause is narrow — a single repo-specific trigger phrase — and lacks multiple concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords are present ("planoai", "Python CLI", "install", "cli/ code") but common variations users would naturally say are missing ("reinstall", "rebuild", "uv tool", "CLI isn't picking up changes"). This fits anchor 3 ('Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms') rather than 4, which expects good coverage with only a few natural terms missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"planoai" plus the explicit "Use after making changes to cli/ code" trigger carves out a clear niche with minimal conflict risk against generic build/install skills. It matches anchor 5 ('Clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk'); anchor 4's 'minor overlap risk with closely related skills' would understate the name-level distinction the planoai identifier provides.