Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is tight and well-structured with a clear, validated checklist for a simple instruction-only skill. Its lone weakness is actionability: it tells Claude what to do but never shows a concrete example of a capability-focused, non-overlapping agent description.
Suggestions
Add one before/after example of an agent description rewritten to be capability-focused and non-overlapping so Claude can copy the pattern.
Show a concrete snippet of the `agents`/`listeners[].agents` config relationship (a small YAML/JSON example) to make the registration check unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, matching the efficient-anchor example rather than the level-2 case that includes unnecessary explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, config-aware guidance (verify agents in both `agents` and `listeners[].agents`, rewrite descriptions to be capability-focused) but provides no executable code or before/after example of a capability-focused description, leaving guidance incomplete; it is above level 1 because the direction is specific, not abstract. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Execution Checklist sequences the work and step 5 ("Provide test prompts to validate routing outcomes") supplies an explicit validation checkpoint, matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor; it is not level 2, which lacks checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references and well-organized sections (When To Use, Apply These Rules, Execution Checklist), so per the simple-skills note it scores 3 without needing separate files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |