Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable PR-creation workflow with built-in validation and no padding. The main gap is missing literal commands for branch creation and PR submission, plus an implicit error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Add the literal commands for steps 2, 4, and 5 (e.g. `git checkout -b <branch>`, `git commit -m`, `gh pr create --base main`) to make every step copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit feedback loop: if cargo fmt or clippy fails, fix the issues and re-run before committing.
Specify how to infer the feature name or provide a fallback naming rule to remove ambiguity in step 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean 9-line body with exact commands and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands for user lookup, cargo fmt/clippy, and the branch naming format, but steps 2, 4, and 5 omit the literal git/gh commands (e.g. git checkout -b, gh pr create). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with a validation checkpoint (fmt + clippy before commit), but lacks an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop, which keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well organized with numbered steps plus a short note; no external references are needed, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |