Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and highly actionable with executable commands and concrete paths, and is appropriately structured for a simple skill. The only gap is workflow clarity, where the secret-key precondition lacks an explicit validate-then-proceed gate.
Suggestions
Frame the backend-key check in step 2 as an explicit validation gate: verify secrets.env exists and is chmod 600 before proceeding, and tell the user what to do if it is missing rather than burying the check in the step text.
Add a brief recovery path for when wire-statusline.sh exits non-zero beyond 'report and stop' (e.g., 'then re-run after fixing the reported issue') so the feedback loop is complete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~30 lines) with every line earning its place; it assumes Claude's competence and does not pad with concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a copy-paste-ready command, concrete file paths with permissions (secrets.env chmod 600, config.local.sh), and an explicit test step, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced with a stop-on-error checkpoint for the wiring script, but the secret-key precondition in step 2 is not framed as a validate-then-proceed gate and there is no fix/retry loop for the destructive wiring operation. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files; sections are well-organized and the only external pointer (the plugin README) is clearly signaled, satisfying the simple-skill carve-out for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |