Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary operational skill: every step is executable, validation and feedback loops are explicit, and edge cases (panel parent jobs, hook reviews, sandbox escalation, default-branch refusal) are handled concretely. The only weaknesses are minor redundancy — the duplicated --since snippet and restated examples — that keep conciseness and progressive disclosure just below top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational with no concept explanations Claude already knows, but the since-scoped bash snippet is duplicated verbatim in section 2 and section 3d, and the Examples section restates loop steps already specified in the Instructions. This matches anchor 4: efficient with minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: copy-paste-ready bash with heredoc-safe variable passing (roborev comment via ROBOREV_COMMENT), exact commands (roborev review --since/--branch --wait, roborev wait, roborev close), exit-code handling for --wait, and two worked examples with clearly marked placeholders. This matches anchor 5's copy-paste-ready commands covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with validation checkpoints at every risky step: branch-match verification, git rev-parse/merge-base --is-ancestor resolution of --since, tests before proceeding, comment-success-before-close ordering, and an explicit full-scope re-review gate before declaring success. The fix-to-re-review feedback loop with iteration limit and remaining-findings reporting matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle, and the body is organized into clear sections (Usage, Instructions with numbered subsections, Examples, See also) with nothing buried. It falls short of anchor 5 only because there is no overview-to-detail split — the ~35-line Examples section and the duplicated since snippet could live in a reference file or be factored to reduce the main body. Not score 3 because structure is good and no content that clearly belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |