Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable, well-sequenced tutorial with explicit validation checkpoints and copy-paste commands. Its weakness is token efficiency: pinned versions and commit hashes sit in the main flow, and the defensive negation prose accumulates padding that could be trimmed or split into a reference file.
Suggestions
Move the pinned versions, commit hashes and long hash-embedded URLs out of the main workflow into a clearly labeled version-pins/old-snapshots reference file (or section), keeping only the current pin inline.
Trim the repeated negation boundary statements (e.g. "A declaration `check` or saved generated Go is not an execution", "Selecting Go alone does not establish a matching compiler") to a single compact limits list.
Consider splitting the "Interpretation and limits" details (signed 64-bit integers, 1,024-byte Text limits, browser-tutorial caveat) into a short reference file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The prose is dense and operational, but time-sensitive pins are embedded in the main flow ("targets Go **1.27.3**", compiler "83928fa", "v0.6.32-dev", Go **1.27.2**) rather than an isolated old-patterns section, and the heavy negation boundary text ("A declaration `check` or saved generated Go is not an execution", "Selecting Go alone does not establish a matching compiler", "These records authorize no live API effects") could be tightened. This fits the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened anchor; the explicit version-pin penalty rules out 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout (bootstrap, mktemp trial dir, package execute/replay, check-tutorial-change) with concrete expected outputs ("returns `score: 75`, `remaining: 25`, `in_range: true` and `label: \"sensor: high\"") and a concrete default edit (`if score >= 60` → `if score >= 80`). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps with explicit validation checkpoints: stop-on-failure with retained diagnostics, compiler validation via `tools/bootstrap-check.go` before skipping bootstrap, inspect-the-actual-record instructions, a three-record comparison step, and "Preserve the first failure instead of calling an incomplete attempt successful". Checkpoints are explicit throughout, matching the top anchor rather than the minor-gaps anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure across workflow / limits / "Other starting points", with variant detail pushed to clearly labeled one-level-deep external links and an explicit "Read only the guidance needed for the actual task" principle. It falls short of the top anchor because reference-grade detail (pinned revisions, hash-laden URLs, the 1,024-byte limits) is inlined rather than split into a separate file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |