CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

check-sanctions-pressure

Retrieve normalized OFAC sanctions pressure — designation summaries, recent additions, and per-country/per-program aggregates including sanctioned vessels and aircraft. Use when the user asks which countries or programs face sanctions pressure, or what was recently designated.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is lean and fully actionable: a single authenticated GET is specified end-to-end with executable examples, error handling, and boundary guidance ('When NOT to use', content-safety). The only structural nit is that the inline response schema and lack of any bundle reference files leave minor organization headroom.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body never explains background concepts (what OFAC or sanctions are) and every section carries operational weight — auth, endpoint, params, response shape, a worked curl, errors, and boundary guidance. Dates appearing in the response JSON are sample data, not time-sensitive instructions.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable: exact endpoint, header, a parameter table with a concrete JMESPath example, a copy-paste-ready curl with jq projection, and error codes with retry guidance cover the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple read-only skill whose single action (one authenticated GET) is unambiguous, and documented error codes with recovery behavior (401/403 cause, 429 retry with backoff) provide checkpoints; the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with a clearly signaled References section, but the ~95-line body inlines the full response schema and the references are external URLs rather than one-level-deep bundle files — good structure with minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete, comprehensive capabilities in third person and pairs them with an explicit, naturally phrased 'Use when' clause. Trigger coverage is good but omits a few common synonyms like 'SDN list' or 'sanctions list'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Retrieve normalized OFAC sanctions pressure — designation summaries, recent additions, and per-country/per-program aggregates including sanctioned vessels and aircraft" enumerates multiple concrete deliverables with comprehensive coverage in third-person voice, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Retrieve normalized OFAC sanctions pressure — designation summaries, recent additions, and per-country/per-program aggregates") and when ("Use when the user asks which countries or programs face sanctions pressure, or what was recently designated") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases like "sanctions pressure", "OFAC", "recently designated", and "sanctioned vessels and aircraft" are present, but common variations such as "SDN list", "sanctions list", or "restricted parties" are missing — good coverage with a few natural terms absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — OFAC aggregate sanctions-pressure analytics with per-country/per-program breakdowns — with distinct triggers and only minimal overlap risk against a point-lookup sanctions skill.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
koala73/worldmonitor
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.