Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable single-file skill: exact tool names, endpoints, parameters, response semantics, and a worked comparison example with correct data-handling guardrails. The only gap is that the comparison workflow is described in prose rather than as an explicit stepwise sequence with a retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is dense and lean: every sentence carries skill-specific knowledge (tool name, MCP endpoint, dataset IDs, parameter ranges, response semantics, REST routes, auth header). No padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the example API key is explicitly flagged as shape-only. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: tool call `get_macro_history` on a named server URL, dataset table with country requirements, parameter values (history true/false, limit 1..365), response schema, copy-paste-ready example requests ("{\"dataset\":\"world-cpi\",\"country\":\"Germany\",\"limit\":12}"), and five complete REST URLs with the auth header name. Not 4: the common cases (MCP history request and REST GET) are both directly executable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present with real checkpoints: "Read `unavailable` first", "request one country at a time and align observation dates and definitions before comparing", "truncated: true means the response is not full history", and "Respect billing denials, rate limits and `Retry-After`". Not 3: the checkpoints are explicit, not merely implied. Not 5: the workflow is embedded in prose rather than a numbered sequence, and there is no explicit validate→fix→retry loop for error recovery. This is read-only retrieval, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references; all content fits inline and is organized into clear sections (Connected plugin, REST and authentication, Errors, Content safety). Per the simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections alone merit 5 here. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |