Conciseness

The body is telegraphic and constraint-dense ("Tie with status -> status", "Cancel stops.", "Silence, elapsed time and tool errors are not approval.") with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token carries an instruction or constraint. There are no over-explanation instances to trim, so it matches the lean anchor rather than anchor 4.

Actionability

It supplies a copy-paste PLAN output template, a complete JSON delegate brief with substitution rules, a bilingual mode-keyword table and concrete constraints ("never emit model = \"inherit\"", "file parses with Python tomllib"). It falls short of anchor 5 because validation steps are named but not shown (no actual tomllib check snippet) and a few directives remain abstract ("Read representative existing roles and applicable AGENTS.md/rules before writing").

Workflow Clarity

The macro sequence (mode -> scope -> ask -> plan -> delegate -> review -> final output) is clearly ordered and mutating/batch operations do carry validation checkpoints (per-file parse verdict, "Main reviews each result, runs its parse/schema/reference checks", sync's independent verification), so the batch cap at 3 does not apply. It misses anchor 5 because the create/improve error-recovery loop is only implied ("applies only verified scoped corrections") rather than an explicit fix-and-revalidate cycle, and the end-to-end order must be assembled across sections.

Progressive Disclosure

Verified against the actual bundle: the ~85-line body defers schema fields, template, discovery rules and the sync procedure to five referenced files that all exist in references/ and are one level deep (they contain no further local file references), each clearly signaled and labeled by purpose in the opening paragraph. This matches the clear-overview, well-signaled one-level-deep-references anchor.

Specificity

"Creates, improves, syncs Codex subagents" lists three concrete actions on a specific object, matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps in coverage' anchor. It is not 5 because the skill's review, list, status and report capabilities are absent, and not 3 because three concrete actions exceed that anchor's 1-2.

Completeness

The what ("Creates, improves, syncs Codex subagents") and the when ("Triggers: create agent, improve agent, sync agents, memory sync") are both explicit, with concrete trigger phrases satisfying the 'Use when...' equivalent. The when-clause is already specific trigger phrases, so the anchor-4 condition ('when' could be more explicit) does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

"Triggers: create agent, improve agent, sync agents, memory sync" provides natural phrases a user would say, but common variations such as "review agent", "list agents", "new agent" and "agent status" are missing, so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Codex subagents" carves a clear niche, but generic trigger phrases like "create agent" could also fire for other agent-authoring skills, giving minor overlap risk with closely related skills rather than the minimal conflict of anchor 5.