Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a deliberately terse adapter skill that efficiently delegates the review engine to superreview while adding a concrete product-specific checklist, but it reads as dense thematic paragraphs rather than an actionable workflow — no step sequence, validation checkpoints, or executable checks are given inline.
Suggestions
Convert the implicit flow into a short numbered sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (e.g., validate each finding against evidence/counterexamples before reporting).
Include at least one concrete executable check or command per major surface (e.g., how to run the existing non-mutating parity checks referenced in the text).
Add section headers (e.g., "## Scope", "## Check surfaces", "## Reporting") so the dense paragraphs are scannable without loading the referenced skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and explains no known concepts, but a few dense phrases (e.g., "keeping the user's explicit product/path/revision boundary" restating the opening boundary) could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists in the enumerated check surfaces ("hook event/schema and JSON output; ESM/async/error handling; shell interpreter/platform assumptions"), but there are no commands, runnable checks, or file-specific steps — execution details are entirely delegated to the linked superreview skill. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough implicit sequence runs through the paragraphs (apply contract → read sources → check surfaces → review via consumer → report), but steps are not enumerated and validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to the sibling superreview skill and its review contract, but it uses dense paragraphs with no section headers, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |