Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model of token efficiency with a clear mode table, explicit alias-retirement rules, and real safety gates for destructive operations. Its weaknesses are execution gaps (no concrete hook-registration or state-writing mechanics) and undiscoverable bundle references: seven reference files exist but none are named or linked, so Claude cannot navigate to them from the skill.
Suggestions
Name and link the reference files explicitly, e.g. "`++m` in plan mode: use [references/planmode.md](references/planmode.md); default: [references/full.md](references/full.md)" so the existing bundle is discoverable.
Add concrete execution detail for `install`/`upgrade`: what the SessionStart/UserPromptSubmit hook entries look like and what is written to `.codex/brewtools/manager/state.json`.
Add a post-action verification step (e.g., after install, confirm exactly one entry per event and report the armed state) to close the workflow-clarity validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and telegraphic with zero padding: "Resolve exactly one canonical mode", "Idempotent: a second run leaves exactly one entry per event", "Silence, elapsed time and tool errors are not approval". It assumes Claude's competence and never explains concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The mode table gives concrete per-mode effects and the resolution rules are specific, but the actual execution details are missing: no commands, file contents, or hook-registration mechanics for how to "Register the SessionStart and UserPromptSubmit handlers" or what to write to `.codex/brewtools/manager/state.json`. This is "Some concrete guidance but incomplete... missing key details" rather than anchor 4's mostly-executable guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The mode-resolution logic and safety gates are explicit ("Obtain confirmation before global writes", purge must "state exactly what will be deleted before running it"), but there is no ordered end-to-end sequence and no post-action verification step (e.g., checking registration after install). This matches "Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit" rather than anchor 4, which expects most checkpoints explicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle contains seven reference files (full.md, planmode.md, architect.md, review-double.md, review-regression.md, cron.md, cron-plan.md) but the body never names or links any of them — the closest it comes is the vague "using the plan-aware reference in plan mode". References are present but not clearly signaled, matching "Some structure but... references present but not clearly signaled"; it is above anchor 2 because the body itself is well-sectioned and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |